Final Blog.

Final blog
Writing 1122 has helped my writing in a few different ways. First off I learned a lot about the writing process and the importance of all of the steps, when they are done thoroughly. I also learned how to help other people edit and revise their papers from different points of view, which helps a lot; at least it did for me. Some of the best editing and revisions that helped and I received was actually from other students in the class. Another great help was Professor’s input on rough drafts and the letters he wrote us. Those definitely helped me with my direction of my papers and where he wanted to see me go with it, or what he wanted to see out of the essay.
I also learned about Ethos, Pathos and Logos, however, we mainly talked about ethos and pathos in class. I definitely can point both of them out in sections of writing now, and be aware of what the writer is wanting the reader to get out of reading his or her piece. I can say that, for me, appeals to Pathos are the most easily to acknowledge in the reading, because it is an appeal to me, as the reader, and trying to get my emotions involved. This, as a reader, can tell if the writer is a good writer by analyzing the appeal, and seeing if it makes them feel like the writer wants to. Now, it is definitely easier for me to critique and analyze an article or writing piece.

Proposed

“September 11th, 2001. What comes to mind is terrorism and a horrific event that sent our country into a war. What most people do not think about is the problems that it caused for many, if not all, of the states to lose funding for education. Oregon was among those states, and was affected greatly. In recent years, Oregon, the Rogue Valley in Southern Oregon in particular, has been greatly affected by a deficit in funding; causing budget cuts in sports programs, learning programs, and spending money. Not only has the Rogue Valley had these problems, but it has also experiences cuts in class time, school closures, and even closures of the public libraries for months at a time.”
This was the intro to my proposal for public good paper. My paper, obviously was about the lack of funding and budget cuts in Oregon after September 11th and the beginning of the war in Iraq. I chose this because it was close to home and there needs to be something done about it, or else the future of the students of Oregon are in huge trouble. People need to see what is happening to the education system around the nation, specifically the Rogue Valley in Oregon, and they need to start thinking about ways to solve the problem. My proposals were create a sales tax, to have our state senators propose a bill, or a ride along to have our timber money put back in Oregon, where it belongs, and call for another land bond measure for a tax levy to raise property tax slightly, and have that go directly to the library funds and school funds. However those are only a couple ways to fix the problems, if only people started acting on these, than we can minimize the problems.

Spanish papers

I just finished a six-page paper, in Spanish. This was probably the hardest paper I have had to write in the history of my Spanish-speaking career. I have written two or three page papers in Spanish before, but never six, nor have I ever had to write a research paper in Spanish or researched anything in Spanish. This was a great learning experience for me, because I had to reach back into my mind a re-learn how to write a research paper because it was in Spanish, and it was like I had never written one before, it was odd, I felt like a seventh grader again, learning how to put a research paper together again.
It was not the structure or how to write necessarily, but all of the steps to take in order to put it together. Normally, in English research papers, I have do so many that I can sit on the computer with a few books next to me and when I need a quote, I can skim pages until I find the best quote. I could not really do that in Spanish, because it took me so long to comprehend and translate each sentence or quote that I had to mark pages or write note cards with what I wanted to use, then I had to outline what I wanted in each paragraph and do the whole routine again, something I had not done in forever. But, I did get it done and it turned out to be a good paper and I am very proud of it, and what I learned.

Rhetorical Questions

Our last assignment in this Writing class was the Rhetorical Analysis of one or a couple Opinion article writers from the Denver Post newspaper. We had a few options we could choose from for our analysis and I chose to use three articles from David Harsanyi and rhetorically analyze them in his appeals to ethos, pathos and logos. However, I chose to focus more on his ethos and pathos than anything else. I analyzed three of his articles, “A stronghold on the GOP”, “Democrats don’t want their elders to be deciders”, and “Conservatives vs. McCain” for a couple reasons, the first is because they are all related on politics and if you read a few political articles from a writer, you can eventually tell how they feel on certain topics, which relates to their ethos. The other reason, is because after reading a couple articles, the reader can really tell if the writer has the authority or credibility to be writing on the topic. A couple of my paragraphs went something like this:
“This proves that Harsanyi has done research on the topic, because of the knowledge of McCain’s stance on issues and the bills he has supported, which adds to his credibility. Not only that, but this also shows that Senator McCain is a more moderate candidate because he calls himself a conservative, but stands for bills that most conservatives do not.”
And that’s just to get an idea, but I learned so much about appeals in this assignment. Things like how writers appeal to pathos and ethos, or how you can read into finding out about an authors ethos or even telling whether they are a credible writer or not.